Wednesday, September 29, 2010

JAMA -- Using Science to Improve the Nation's Health System: NIH's Commitment to Comparative Effectiveness Research, June 2, 2010, Lauer and Collins 303 (21): 2182

Perspective on comparative effectiveness research from the NIH


JAMA -- Using Science to Improve the Nation's Health System: NIH's Commitment to Comparative Effectiveness Research, June 2, 2010, Lauer and Collins 303 (21): 2182

1 comment:

  1. This discussion of comparative effectiveness research is intriguing. The many ways that such research can be utilized effectively suggest that it is a powerful tool. The discussion of randomized, controlled trials was particularly interesting. These studies are of course considered the gold standard with respect to minimizing bias and producing useful, meaningful data. However, such studies, especially outside of controlled environments, are extremely challenging or even impossible to produce. Researchers might have a vested interest in performing these types of studies because they are well-regarded and can get published in the most preeminent journals. However, studies that are less theoretically rigorous can still provide a great deal of useful information, as this article discusses. Furthermore, some of the most pressing issues affecting health outcomes might only be able to be investigated with these less stringent techniques. Perhaps we as researchers have an obligation to perform these studies so that our work can relate to the most serious areas of need.

    ReplyDelete